Hot File

Test React Components Using Jest

View: 4834    Dowload: 0   Comment: 0   Post by: hanhga  
Author: none   Category: Javascript   Fields: Other

9 point/1 review File has been tested

This article is by guest author Jack Franklin. SitePoint guest posts aim to bring you engaging content from prominent writers and speakers of the JavaScript community.

Introduction

This article is by guest author Jack Franklin. SitePoint guest posts aim to bring you engaging content from prominent writers and speakers of the JavaScript community. This article was peer reviewed by Dan Prince and Christoph Pojer. Thanks to all of SitePoint’s peer reviewers for making SitePoint content the best it can be!

In this article we will take a look at using Jest, a testing framework maintained by Facebook, to test our ReactJS components. We’ll look at how we can use Jest first on plain JavaScript functions, before looking at some of the features it provides out of the box specifically aimed at making testing React apps easier. It’s worth noting that Jest isn’t aimed specifically at React — you can use it to test any JavaScript applications. However, a couple of the features it provides come in really handy for testing user interfaces, which is why it’s a great fit with React.

Sample Application :

Before we can test anything, we need an application to test! Staying true to web development tradition, I’ve built a small todo application that we’ll use as the starting point. You can find it, along with all the tests that we’re about to write, on GitHub. If you’d like to play with the application to get a feel for it, you can also find a live demo online.

The application is written in ES2015, compiled using Webpack with the Babel ES2015 and React presets. I won’t go into the details of the build set up, but it’s all in the GitHub repo if you’d like to check it out. You’ll find full instructions in the README on how to get the app running locally. If you’d like to read more, the application is built using Webpack, and I recommend “A Beginner’s guide to Webpack” as a good introduction to the tool.

The entry point of the application, app/index.js, which just renders the Todos component into the HTML:

render(
  <Todos />,
  document.getElementById('app')
);

The Todos component is the main hub of the application. It contains all the state (hard coded data for this application — in reality this would likely come from an API or similar) and has code to render the two child components: Todo, which is rendered once for each todo in the state, and AddTodo, which is rendered once and provides the form for a user to add a new todo.

Because the Todos component contains all the state, it needs the Todo and AddTodo components to notify it whenever anything changes. Therefore it passes functions down into these components that they can call when some data changes, and Todos can update the state accordingly.

Finally, for now, you’ll notice that all the business logic is contained in app/state-functions.js.

export function toggleDone(state, id) {...}

export function addTodo(state, todo) {...}

export function deleteTodo(state, id) {...}

These are all pure functions that take the state and some data, and return the new state. If you’re unfamiliar with pure functions, they are functions that only reference data they are given and have no side effects. For more, you can read my article on A List Apart on pure functions and my article on SitePoint about pure functions and React.

If you’re familiar with Redux, they are fairly similar to what Redux would call a reducer. In fact, if this application got much bigger I would consider moving into Redux for a more explicit, structured approach to data. But for this size application you’ll often find that local component state and some well abstracted functions to be more than enough.

To TDD or not to TDD?

There have been many articles written on the pros and cons of Test Driven Development, where developers are expected to write the tests first, before writing the code to fix the test. The idea behind this is that by writing the test first, you have to think about the API that you’re writing and it can lead to a better design. For me I find that this very much comes down to personal preference and also to the sort of thing I’m testing. I’ve found that for React components I like to write the components first and then add tests to the most important bits of functionality. However, if you find that writing tests first for your components fits your workflow, then you should do that. There’s no hard rule here; do whatever feels best for you and your team.

Introducing Jest

Jest was first released in 2014 and although it initially garnered a lot of interest, the project was dormant for a while and not so actively worked on. However, Facebook has invested the last year into improving Jest and recently published a few releases with impressive changes that make it worth reconsidering. The only resemblance of Jest compared to the initial open source release is the name and the logo, everything else has been changed and rewritten. If you’d like to find out more about this, you can read Christoph Pojer’s comment where he discusses the current state of the project.

If you’ve been frustrated by setting up Babel, React and JSX tests using another framework, then I definitely recommend giving Jest a try. If you’ve found your existing test set up to be slow, I also highly recommend Jest. It automatically runs tests in parallel, and its watch mode is able to run only tests relevant to the changed file, which is invaluable when you have a large suite of tests. It comes with JSDom configured, meaning you can write browser tests but run them through Node, can deal with asynchronous tests and has advanced features such as mocking, spies and stubs built in.

Installing and Configuring Jest

To start with we need to get Jest installed. Because we’re also using Babel we’ll install another couple of modules that make Jest and Babel play nicely out of the box:

npm install --save-dev babel-jest babel-polyfill babel-preset-es2015 babel-preset-react jest

You also need to have a .babelrc file with Babel configured to use any presets and plugins you need. The sample project already has this file, which looks like so:

{
  "presets": ["es2015", "react"]
}

We won’t install any React testing tools yet, because we’re not going to start with testing our components, but our state functions.

Jest expects to find our tests in a __tests__ folder, which has become a popular convention in the JavaScript community, and it’s one we’re going to stick to here. If you are not a fan of the __tests__ setup, out of the box Jest also supports finding any .test.js and .spec.js files too.

As we’ll be testing our state functions, go ahead and create __tests__/state-functions.test.js.

We’ll write a proper test shortly, but for now put in this dummy test, which will let us check everything’s working correctly and we have Jest configured.

describe('Addition', () => {
  it('knows that 2 and 2 make 4', () => {
    expect(2 + 2).toBe(4);
  });
});

Now, head into your package.json. We need to set up npm test so that it runs Jest, and we can do that simply by setting thetest script to run jest.

"scripts": {
  "test": "jest"
}

If you now run npm test locally, you should see your tests run, and pass!

PASS  __tests__/state-functions.test.js
  Addition
    ✓ knows that 2 and 2 make 4 (5ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       1 passed, 1 total
Snapshots:   0 passed, 0 total
Time:        3.11s

If you’ve ever used Jasmine, or most testing frameworks, the above test code itself should be pretty familiar. Jest lets us usedescribe and it to nest tests as we need to. How much nesting you use is up to you; I like to nest mine so all the descriptive strings passed to describe and it read almost as a sentence.

When it comes to making actual assertions, you wrap the thing you want to test within an expect() call, before then calling an assertion on it. In this case we’ve used toBe. You can find a list of all the available assertions on the Jest documentation.toBe checks that the given value matches the value under test, using === to do so. We’ll meet a few of Jest’s assertions through this tutorial.

Testing Business Logic

Now we’ve seen Jest work on a dummy test, let’s get it running on a real one! We’re going to test the first of our state functions, toggleDonetoggleDone takes the current state and the ID of a todo that we’d like to toggle. Each todo has adone property, and toggleDone should swap it from true to false, or vice-versa.

If you’re following along with this, make sure you’ve cloned the repo and have copied the app folder to the same directory that contains your ___tests__ folder. You’ll also need to install the shortid package (npm install shortid --save) which is a dependency of the Todo app.

I’ll start by importing the function from app/state-functions.js, and setting up the test’s structure. Whilst Jest allows you to use describe and it to nest as deeply as you’d like to, you can also use test, which will often read better. test is just an alias to Jest’s it function, but can sometimes make tests much easier to read and less nested.

For example, here’s how I would write that test with nested describe and it calls:

import { toggleDone } from '../app/state-functions';

describe('toggleDone', () => {
  describe('when given an incomplete todo', () => {
    it('marks the todo as completed', () => {
    });
  });
});

And here’s how I would do it with test:

import { toggleDone } from '../app/state-functions';

test('toggleDone completes an incomplete todo', () => {
});

The test still reads nicely; but there’s less indentation getting in the way now. This one is mainly down to personal preference; choose whichever style you’re more comfortable with.

Now we can write the assertion. First we’ll create our starting state, before passing it into toggleDone, along with the ID of the todo that we want to toggle. toggleDone will return our finish state, which we can then assert on:

const startState = {
  todos: [{ id: 1, done: false, name: 'Buy Milk' }]
};

const finState = toggleDone(startState, 1);

expect(finState.todos).toEqual([
  { id: 1, done: true, name: 'Buy Milk' }
]);

Notice now that I use toEqual to make my assertion. You should use toBe on primitive values, such as strings and numbers, but toEqual on objects and arrays. toEqual is built to deal with arrays and objects, and will recursively check each field or item within the object given to ensure that it matches.

With that we can now run npm test and see our state function test pass:

PASS  __tests__/state-functions.test.js
  ✓ tooggleDone completes an incomplete todo (9ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       1 passed, 1 total
Snapshots:   0 passed, 0 total
Time:        3.166s

Rerunning Tests on Changes

It’s a bit frustrating to make changes to a test file and then have to manually run npm test again. One of Jest’s best features is its watch mode, which watches for file changes and runs tests accordingly. It can even figure out which subset of tests to run based on the file that changed. It’s incredibly powerful and reliable, and you’re able to run Jest in watch mode and leave it all day whilst you craft your code.

To run it in watch mode, you can run npm test -- --watch. Anything you pass to npm test after the first -- will be passed straight through to the underlying command. This means that these two commands are effectively equivalent:

  • npm test -- --watch
  • jest --watch

I would recommend that you leave Jest running in another tab, or terminal window, for the rest of this tutorial.

Before moving onto testing the React components, we’ll write one more test on another one of our state functions. In a real application I would write many more tests, but for the sake of the tutorial, I’ll skip some of them. For now, let’s write a test that ensures that our deleteTodo function is working. Before seeing how I’ve written it below, try writing it yourself and seeing how your test compares.

The test doesn’t vary too much from the first, we set up our initial state, run our function and then assert on the finished state. If you left Jest running in watch mode, notice how it picks up your new test and runs it, and how quick it is to do so! It’s a great way to get instant feedback on your tests as you write them.

The tests above also demonstrate the perfect layout for a test, which is:

  • Set up
  • Execute the function under test
  • Assert on the results

By keeping the tests laid out in this way, you’ll find them easier to follow and work with.

Now we’re happy testing our state functions, let’s move onto React components.

Testing React Components

It’s worth noting that by default I would actually encourage you to not write too many tests on your React components. Anything that you want to test very thoroughly, such as business logic, should be pulled out of your components and sit in standalone functions, just like the state functions that we tested earlier. That said, it is useful at times to test some React interactions (making sure a specific function is called with the right arguments when the user clicks a button, for example). We’ll start by testing that our React components render the right data, and then look at testing interactions. Then we’ll move onto snapshots, a feature of Jest that makes testing the output of React components much more convenient.

To do this, we’ll need to make use of react-addons-test-utils, a library that provides functions for testing React. We’ll also install Enzyme, a wrapper library written by AirBnB that makes testing React components much easier. We’ll use this API throughout our tests. Enzyme is a fantastic library and the React team even recommend it as the way to test React components.

npm install --save-dev react-addons-test-utils enzyme

Let’s test that the Todo component renders the text of its todo inside a paragraph. First we’ll create__tests__/todo.test.js, and import our component:

import Todo from '../app/todo';
import React from 'react';
import { mount } from 'enzyme';

test('Todo component renders the text of the todo', () => {
});

I also import mount from Enzyme. The mount function is used to render our component and then allow us to inspect the output and make assertions on it. Even though we’re running our tests in Node, we can still write tests that require a DOM. This is because Jest configures jsdom, a library that implements the DOM in Node. This is great because we can write DOM based tests without having to fire up a browser each time to test them.

We can use mount to create our Todo:

const todo = { id: 1, done: false, name: 'Buy Milk' };
const wrapper = mount(
  <Todo todo={todo} />
);

And then we can call wrapper.find, giving it a CSS selector, to find the paragraph that we’re expecting to contain the text of the Todo. This API might remind you of jQuery, and that’s by design. It’s a very intuitive API for searching rendered output to find the matching elements.

const p = wrapper.find('.toggle-todo');

And finally, we can assert that the text within it is Buy Milk:

expect(p.text()).toBe('Buy Milk');

Which leaves our entire test looking like so:

import Todo from '../app/todo';
import React from 'react';
import { mount } from 'enzyme';

test('TodoComponent renders the text inside it', () => {
  const todo = { id: 1, done: false, name: 'Buy Milk' };
  const wrapper = mount(
    <Todo todo={todo} />
  );
  const p = wrapper.find('.toggle-todo');
  expect(p.text()).toBe('Buy Milk');
});

Phew! You might think that was a lot of work and effort to check that ‘Buy Milk’ gets placed onto the screen and well…you’d be correct. Hold your horses for now though; in the next section we’ll look at using Jest’s snapshot ability to make this much easier.

In the meantime, let’s look at how you can use Jest’s spy functionality to assert that functions are called with specific arguments. This is useful in our case because we have the Todo component which is given two functions as properties, which it should call when the user clicks a button or performs an interaction.

In this test we’re going to assert that when the todo is clicked, the component will call the doneChange prop that it’s given.

test('Todo calls doneChange when todo is clicked', () => {
});

What we want to do is to have a function that we can keep track of its calls, and the arguments that it’s called with. Then we can check that when the user clicks the todo, the doneChange function is called and also called with the correct arguments. Thankfully, Jest provides this out of the box with spies. A spy is a function whose implementation you don’t care about; you just care about when and how it’s called. Think of it as you spying on the function. To create one we call jest.fn():

const doneChange = jest.fn();

This gives a function that we can spy on and make sure it’s called correctly. Let’s start by rendering our Todo with the right props:

const todo = { id: 1, done: false, name: 'Buy Milk' };
const doneChange = jest.fn();
const wrapper = mount(
  <Todo todo={todo} doneChange={doneChange} />
);

Next, we can find our paragraph again, just like in the previous test:

const p = TestUtils.findRenderedDOMComponentWithClass(rendered, 'toggle-todo');

And then we can call simulate on it to simulate a user event, passing click as the argument:

p.simulate('click');

And all that is left to do is assert that our spy function has been called correctly. In this case, we’re expecting it to be called with the ID of the todo, which is 1. We can use expect(doneChange).toBeCalledWith(1) to assert this, and with that we’re done with our test!

test('TodoComponent calls doneChange when todo is clicked', () => {
  const todo = { id: 1, done: false, name: 'Buy Milk' };
  const doneChange = jest.fn();
  const wrapper = mount(
    <Todo todo={todo} doneChange={doneChange} />
  );

  const p = wrapper.find('.toggle-todo');
  p.simulate('click');
  expect(doneChange).toBeCalledWith(1);
});

Better Component Testing with Snapshots

I mentioned above that this might feel like a lot of work to test React components, especially some of the more mundane functionalities (such as rendering the text). Rather than make a large amount of assertions on React components, Jest lets you run snapshot tests. These are not so useful for interactions (in which case I still prefer a test like we just wrote above), but for testing that the output of your component is correct, they are much easier.

When you run a snapshot test, Jest renders the React component under test and stores the result in a JSON file. Every time the test runs, Jest will check that the React component still renders the same output as the snapshot. Then, when you change a component’s behaviour, Jest will tell you and either:

  • You’ll realise you made a mistake, and you can fix the component so it matches the snapshot again.
  • Or, you made that change on purpose, and you can tell Jest to update the snapshot.

This way of testing means that:

  • You don’t have to write a lot of assertions to ensure your React components are behaving as expected.
  • You can never accidentally change a component’s behaviour, because Jest will realise.

You also don’t have to snapshot all your components; in fact I’d actively recommend against it. You should pick components with some functionality that you really need to ensure is working. Snapshotting all your components will just lead to slow tests that aren’t useful. Remember, React is a very thoroughly tested framework, so we can be confident that it will behave as expected. Make sure you don’t end up testing the framework, rather than your code!

To get started with snapshot testing, we need one more Node package. react-test-renderer is a package that is able to take a React component and render it as a pure JavaScript object. This means it can then be saved to a file, and this is what Jest uses to keep track of our snapshots.

npm install --save-dev react-test-renderer

Now, let’s rewrite our first Todo component test to use a snapshot. For now, comment out the TodoComponent calls doneChange when todo is clicked test as well.

The first thing you need to do is import the react-test-renderer, and also remove the import for mount. They cannot both be used; you either have to use one or the other. This is why we have commented the other test out for now.

import renderer from 'react-test-renderer';

Now I’ll use the renderer we just imported to render the component, and assert that it matches the snapshot:

describe('Todo component renders the todo correctly', () => {
  it('renders correctly', () => {
    const todo = { id: 1, done: false, name: 'Buy Milk' };
    const rendered = renderer.create(
      <Todo todo={todo} />
    );
    expect(rendered.toJSON()).toMatchSnapshot();
  });
});

The first time you run this, Jest is clever enough to realise that there is no snapshot for this component, so it creates it. Let’s take a look at __tests__/__snapshots__/todo.test.js.snap:

exports[`Todo component renders the todo correctly renders correctly 1`] = `
<div
  className="todo  todo-1">
  <p
    className="toggle-todo"
    onClick={[Function]}>
    Buy Milk
  </p>
  <a
    className="delete-todo"
    href="#"
    onClick={[Function]}>
    Delete
  </a>
</div>
`;

You can see that Jest has saved the output for us, and now the next time we run this test it will check that the outputs are the same. To demonstrate this, I’ll break the component by removing the paragraph that renders the text of the todo, meaning that I’ve removed this line from the Todo component:

<p className="toggle-todo" onClick={() => this.toggleDone() }>{ todo.name }</p>

Let’s see what Jest says now:

“`sh
FAIL tests/todo.test.js
● Todo component renders the todo correctly › renders correctly

expect(value).toMatchSnapshot()

Received value does not match stored snapshot 1.

  • Snapshot

  • Received

  • className=”toggle-todo”

  • onClick={[Function]}>

  • Buy Milk

  • Delete

    at Object. (tests/todo.test.js:21:31)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:103:7)
    “`

Jest realised that the snapshot doesn’t match the new component, and lets us know in the output. If we think that this change is correct, we can run jest with the -u flag, which will update the snapshot. In this case though I’ll undo my change and Jest is happy once more.

Next we can look at how we might use snapshot testing to test interactions. You can have multiple snapshots per test, so you can test that the output after an interaction is as expected.

We can’t actually test our Todo component interactions through Jest snapshots, because they don’t control their own state but call the callback props they are given. What I’ve done here is move the snapshot test into a new file,todo.snapshot.test.js, and leave our toggling test in todo.test.js. I’ve found it useful to separate the snapshot tests into a different file; it also means that you don’t get conflicts between react-test-renderer and react-addons-test-utils.

Remember, you’ll find all the code that I’ve written in this tutorial available on GitHub for you to check out and run locally

Test React Components Using Jest

Test React Components Using Jest Posted on 06-10-2016  This article is by guest author Jack Franklin. SitePoint guest posts aim to bring you engaging content from prominent writers and speakers of the JavaScript community. 9/10 4834

Comment:

To comment you must be logged in members.

Files with category

  • JUnit 5 State Of The Union using java

    View: 429    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    JUnit 5 State Of The Union using java

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    4.5/1 review
    JUnit 5 has been under development for about 14 months now and the prototype is almost a year old. Time to summarize what happened so far, where the project stands, and where it’s going.

  • Getting Started with Dropwizard using java

    View: 497    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    Getting Started with Dropwizard using java

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    4.5/1 review
    Dropwizard is a framework for building RESTful web services in Java. In this tutorial we’re going to have a look at how to get started with developing a Dropwizard application by building a new service from scratch.

  • Build Query NULL Value in MySql

    View: 229    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    Build Query NULL Value in MySql

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    2.5/2 review
    Misunderstanding NULL is common mistake beginners do while writing MySql query. While quering in MySql they compare column name with NULL. In MySql NULL is nothing or in simple word it isUnknown Value so if you use comparison operator for NULL values...

  • Manage Your JavaScript Application State with MobX

    View: 231    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    Manage Your JavaScript Application State with MobX

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    2.25/2 review
    This article was peer reviewed by Michel Weststrate and Aaron Boyer. Thanks to all of SitePoint’s peer reviewers for making SitePoint content the best it can be!

  • Build Bringing Pages to Life with the Web Animations API

    View: 241    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    Build Bringing Pages to Life with the Web Animations API

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    4.5/2 review
    This article is by guest author Dudley Storey. SitePoint guest posts aim to bring you engaging content from prominent writers and speakers of the JavaScript community.

  • How to Style Google Custom Search Manually

    View: 210    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    How to Style Google Custom Search Manually

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    0/0 review
    Website owners very often decide on using Google’s Custom Search Engine (GCSE) for searching through their content instead of using built-in and/or custom search functionality. The reason is simple – it’s much less work, and most often it does the...

  • Test React Components Using Jest

    View: 4834    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    Test React Components Using Jest

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    4.5/1 review
    This article is by guest author Jack Franklin. SitePoint guest posts aim to bring you engaging content from prominent writers and speakers of the JavaScript community.

  • Programming Question Reverse String without using String function

    View: 622    Download: 0   Comment: 0   Author: none  

    Programming Question Reverse String without using String function

    Category: Javascript
    Fields: Other

    0/0 review
    Write a program to reverse string without using string function. You don’t have to use any in-built string library function. This problem can be solved by multiple approaches. Let’s check it.

 
Newsletter Email

File suggestion for you

File top downloads

logo codetitle
Codetitle.com - library source code to share, download the file to the community
Copyright © 2015. All rights reserved. codetitle.com Develope by Vinagon .Ltd